<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 721 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267912</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a motor vehicle manufacturer, allowing Cenvat credit for service tax paid on Mandap Keeper service and rent-a-cab service. The Tribunal found precedents supporting the eligibility for credit on both services, used for various activities such as meetings, vehicle launches, employee transportation, and official visits. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and allowed the appeals, determining that the denial of Cenvat credit was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 721 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267912</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a motor vehicle manufacturer, allowing Cenvat credit for service tax paid on Mandap Keeper service and rent-a-cab service. The Tribunal found precedents supporting the eligibility for credit on both services, used for various activities such as meetings, vehicle launches, employee transportation, and official visits. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and allowed the appeals, determining that the denial of Cenvat credit was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>