https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267876 A major penalty of reduction by two stages in the time scale of pay for one year under the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 was upheld because the prescribed disciplinary procedure was followed: charge memo, enquiry, supply of the enquiry report, consideration of objections, personal hearing, and a speaking decision by the disciplinary authority. There was no breach of natural justice or procedural illegality. Judicial interference was held to be limited to cases of findings that are wholly perverse or unsupported by evidence, and no such perversity was shown on the facts, including the distinction between the petitioner's conduct and the proceedings relating to the exporter. The writ petition was therefore liable to be dismissed. en-us Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jan 2016 17:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267876 A major penalty of reduction by two stages in the time scale of pay for one year under the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 was upheld because the prescribed disciplinary procedure was followed: charge memo, enquiry, supply of the enquiry report, consideration of objections, personal hearing, and a speaking decision by the disciplinary authority. There was no breach of natural justice or procedural illegality. Judicial interference was held to be limited to cases of findings that are wholly perverse or unsupported by evidence, and no such perversity was shown on the facts, including the distinction between the petitioner's conduct and the proceedings relating to the exporter. The writ petition was therefore liable to be dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267876