<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 684 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267875</link>
    <description>The Court found in favor of the petitioner regarding the imposition of anti-dumping duty on Ultra Slim Colour Picture Tubes, ruling that the duty was not extended beyond the initial notification, thus protecting the petitioner&#039;s rights. In the dispute over compliance with the Customs Manual for clearance of imported goods, the Court directed Customs Authorities to assess the duty based on compliance with the manual and allowed the petitioner time to submit missing documents. Regarding the summons issued under Section 108 of the Customs Act, the Court determined it was unrelated to the current matter and granted the petitioner the opportunity to raise defenses before the issuing authority. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs imposed, emphasizing adherence to legal procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 684 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267875</link>
      <description>The Court found in favor of the petitioner regarding the imposition of anti-dumping duty on Ultra Slim Colour Picture Tubes, ruling that the duty was not extended beyond the initial notification, thus protecting the petitioner&#039;s rights. In the dispute over compliance with the Customs Manual for clearance of imported goods, the Court directed Customs Authorities to assess the duty based on compliance with the manual and allowed the petitioner time to submit missing documents. Regarding the summons issued under Section 108 of the Customs Act, the Court determined it was unrelated to the current matter and granted the petitioner the opportunity to raise defenses before the issuing authority. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs imposed, emphasizing adherence to legal procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>