<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 660 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267851</link>
    <description>Transferring excisable liquid goods from tankers into carboys and affixing labels was held not to amount to manufacture under Chapter Note 5 to Chapter 38. The Board&#039;s circular clarified that a tanker is not a bulk pack and that mere transfer from tankers into smaller containers does not constitute repacking from bulk packs to retail packs; the relevant enquiry is whether the container or tanker itself can be treated as a bulk pack. As the activity involved offloading from tankers into carboys, the deeming fiction of manufacture was not attracted. No duty was payable at the Mumbai premises, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 660 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267851</link>
      <description>Transferring excisable liquid goods from tankers into carboys and affixing labels was held not to amount to manufacture under Chapter Note 5 to Chapter 38. The Board&#039;s circular clarified that a tanker is not a bulk pack and that mere transfer from tankers into smaller containers does not constitute repacking from bulk packs to retail packs; the relevant enquiry is whether the container or tanker itself can be treated as a bulk pack. As the activity involved offloading from tankers into carboys, the deeming fiction of manufacture was not attracted. No duty was payable at the Mumbai premises, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>