<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 644 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267835</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to quash the notice under section 148 and the subsequent assessment order due to lack of proper approval from the Commissioner or Chief Commissioner as mandated by law. It was concluded that the notice issued with the Additional Commissioner&#039;s approval was invalid, as it did not meet the statutory requirements. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer must have an independent reason to believe that income had escaped assessment, which was lacking in this case where the reopening was solely based on information without verification. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 27/10/2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2015 01:24:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 644 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267835</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to quash the notice under section 148 and the subsequent assessment order due to lack of proper approval from the Commissioner or Chief Commissioner as mandated by law. It was concluded that the notice issued with the Additional Commissioner&#039;s approval was invalid, as it did not meet the statutory requirements. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer must have an independent reason to believe that income had escaped assessment, which was lacking in this case where the reopening was solely based on information without verification. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 27/10/2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>