<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 636 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267827</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not justified as the assessee&#039;s claim was bona fide and supported by existing legal precedent. The order imposing the penalty was set aside, and the Assessing Officer was directed to delete the penalty. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the penalties under section 271(1)(c) were ordered to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 636 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267827</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not justified as the assessee&#039;s claim was bona fide and supported by existing legal precedent. The order imposing the penalty was set aside, and the Assessing Officer was directed to delete the penalty. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the penalties under section 271(1)(c) were ordered to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>