<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 627 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267818</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the Assessing Officer to reassess the matter considering the income as business income rather than income from house property. The Tribunal emphasized that income from holding and letting out property for business purposes should be categorized as business income. The expenses claimed by the assessee were allowed in part, and the case was remanded for a fresh assessment based on this legal interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 627 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267818</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the Assessing Officer to reassess the matter considering the income as business income rather than income from house property. The Tribunal emphasized that income from holding and letting out property for business purposes should be categorized as business income. The expenses claimed by the assessee were allowed in part, and the case was remanded for a fresh assessment based on this legal interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>