<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 811 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175250</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the Corporation&#039;s appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and reinstating the Labor Court&#039;s award. The employee&#039;s appeal for full back wages was dismissed. The Court emphasized the importance of providing reasons in judicial decisions and upheld the principle of proportionate punishment for misconduct, particularly in cases of corruption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2016 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 811 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175250</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the Corporation&#039;s appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and reinstating the Labor Court&#039;s award. The employee&#039;s appeal for full back wages was dismissed. The Court emphasized the importance of providing reasons in judicial decisions and upheld the principle of proportionate punishment for misconduct, particularly in cases of corruption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>