https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175245 A State regulatory scheme for recognised educational institutions was upheld because, in pith and substance, it related to education within the State's legislative field, and its impact on the internal management of societies and trustees was only incidental. The provisions permitting approval of appointments, supervisory directions, inspection, and appointment of an authorised controller were treated as safeguards to secure educational standards and compliance, not as uncontrolled or unreasonable powers. The challenge under Articles 14, 19(1)(c), 19(1)(f) and 31 failed because the classification had a rational basis, and temporary suspension of management did not amount to deprivation of property. The question on removal-of-difficulties powers was left open. en-us Mon, 17 Jan 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Nov 2015 17:40:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175245 A State regulatory scheme for recognised educational institutions was upheld because, in pith and substance, it related to education within the State's legislative field, and its impact on the internal management of societies and trustees was only incidental. The provisions permitting approval of appointments, supervisory directions, inspection, and appointment of an authorised controller were treated as safeguards to secure educational standards and compliance, not as uncontrolled or unreasonable powers. The challenge under Articles 14, 19(1)(c), 19(1)(f) and 31 failed because the classification had a rational basis, and temporary suspension of management did not amount to deprivation of property. The question on removal-of-difficulties powers was left open. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Jan 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175245