<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 662 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175243</link>
    <description>The detenu&#039;s right under Article 22(5) to make an effective representation before the Advisory Board includes a meaningful opportunity to be assisted by a non-legal friend and to produce witnesses in rebuttal. Although the Board may regulate its procedure, that procedure must still ensure procedural fairness and equal opportunity. A notice issued at 8.30 a.m. requiring the detenu to decide and act within about one hour was held insufficient to provide a full and proper opportunity. The possibility of seeking adjournment did not cure the inadequacy of the opportunity already afforded, and the detention could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 17:40:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 662 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175243</link>
      <description>The detenu&#039;s right under Article 22(5) to make an effective representation before the Advisory Board includes a meaningful opportunity to be assisted by a non-legal friend and to produce witnesses in rebuttal. Although the Board may regulate its procedure, that procedure must still ensure procedural fairness and equal opportunity. A notice issued at 8.30 a.m. requiring the detenu to decide and act within about one hour was held insufficient to provide a full and proper opportunity. The possibility of seeking adjournment did not cure the inadequacy of the opportunity already afforded, and the detention could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>