https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175242 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the reversion order of the respondent from Senior Station Incharge to Junior Station Incharge. The Court found the reversion punitive, violating Article 311(2) and Article 16(1) of the Constitution due to lack of proper inquiry and discriminatory treatment. Emphasizing fair play, the Court dismissed the appeal, allowing authorities to take legal action with just grounds if needed. en-us Mon, 08 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Nov 2015 17:34:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175242 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the reversion order of the respondent from Senior Station Incharge to Junior Station Incharge. The Court found the reversion punitive, violating Article 311(2) and Article 16(1) of the Constitution due to lack of proper inquiry and discriminatory treatment. Emphasizing fair play, the Court dismissed the appeal, allowing authorities to take legal action with just grounds if needed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175242