https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175236 Preventive detention was upheld where the Court found no infirmity in the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction. Delay in issuing the order did not vitiate detention because the live link between the prejudicial acts and the need for detention had not snapped. The intimation on appearance through a legal practitioner before the Advisory Board was not misleading, and no non-application of mind was shown from the translation issue or alleged mechanical exercise. Non-supply of the sponsoring authority's proposal did not prejudice representation because it was not a relied-upon document. The Court also accepted reliance on contemporaneous in-camera statements and held that the complainant's affidavit, the original complaint, and the co-accused's bail order did not vitiate the detention. en-us Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Nov 2015 17:18:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175236 Preventive detention was upheld where the Court found no infirmity in the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction. Delay in issuing the order did not vitiate detention because the live link between the prejudicial acts and the need for detention had not snapped. The intimation on appearance through a legal practitioner before the Advisory Board was not misleading, and no non-application of mind was shown from the translation issue or alleged mechanical exercise. Non-supply of the sponsoring authority's proposal did not prejudice representation because it was not a relied-upon document. The Court also accepted reliance on contemporaneous in-camera statements and held that the complainant's affidavit, the original complaint, and the co-accused's bail order did not vitiate the detention. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175236