https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175235 Section 10 reference under the Industrial Disputes Act was held valid even though the dismissal preceded the commencement of Section 2A, because the reference depends on whether an industrial dispute existed or was apprehended when made, not on when the underlying occurred. The Court also held that the domestic enquiry was fair where the workman had to secure his witness, and the enquiry officer had no duty to obtain departmental permission for that witness. After a fair enquiry, the Labour Court could not reappraise evidence or interfere with findings and punishment absent perversity or lack of evidence. en-us Thu, 24 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Nov 2015 17:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175235 Section 10 reference under the Industrial Disputes Act was held valid even though the dismissal preceded the commencement of Section 2A, because the reference depends on whether an industrial dispute existed or was apprehended when made, not on when the underlying occurred. The Court also held that the domestic enquiry was fair where the workman had to secure his witness, and the enquiry officer had no duty to obtain departmental permission for that witness. After a fair enquiry, the Labour Court could not reappraise evidence or interfere with findings and punishment absent perversity or lack of evidence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175235