<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (10) TMI 230 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175232</link>
    <description>Preventive detention may rest on relevant material showing past conduct and a reasonable apprehension of prejudicial activity even where no criminal case has been registered, so absence of prosecution alone does not negate subjective satisfaction. However, the detenu&#039;s representation must be considered and communicated with reasonable expedition; unexplained delay in communicating rejection breached Article 22(5). The detenu must also receive an effective opportunity of hearing before the Advisory Board, including the chance to appear and produce witnesses where sought; denial of that meaningful hearing rendered the detention unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 16:51:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (10) TMI 230 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175232</link>
      <description>Preventive detention may rest on relevant material showing past conduct and a reasonable apprehension of prejudicial activity even where no criminal case has been registered, so absence of prosecution alone does not negate subjective satisfaction. However, the detenu&#039;s representation must be considered and communicated with reasonable expedition; unexplained delay in communicating rejection breached Article 22(5). The detenu must also receive an effective opportunity of hearing before the Advisory Board, including the chance to appear and produce witnesses where sought; denial of that meaningful hearing rendered the detention unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>