<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 42 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1108</link>
    <description>For ex-factory clearances under section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, freight charges separately recovered through commercial invoices are not includible in assessable value merely because they were omitted from the excise invoices. The relevant pricing basis was ex-factory, and the separate recovery of freight did not by itself justify adding those charges to the assessable value. On that principle, the freight demand was unsustainable and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 42 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1108</link>
      <description>For ex-factory clearances under section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, freight charges separately recovered through commercial invoices are not includible in assessable value merely because they were omitted from the excise invoices. The relevant pricing basis was ex-factory, and the separate recovery of freight did not by itself justify adding those charges to the assessable value. On that principle, the freight demand was unsustainable and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>