<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 660 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175224</link>
    <description>Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code was upheld as valid and constitutional because a law cannot be struck down merely on the ground that it may be misused in individual cases; any abuse must be addressed in the specific action, not by invalidating the provision itself. The Court also declined to direct a Central Bureau of Investigation inquiry, finding no sufficient basis for investigative relief and leaving the petitioner to contest the pending trial, if any, on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 660 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175224</link>
      <description>Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code was upheld as valid and constitutional because a law cannot be struck down merely on the ground that it may be misused in individual cases; any abuse must be addressed in the specific action, not by invalidating the provision itself. The Court also declined to direct a Central Bureau of Investigation inquiry, finding no sufficient basis for investigative relief and leaving the petitioner to contest the pending trial, if any, on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>