<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Rules Payment as License Fee, Not Capital Asset Acquisition; Classified as Revenue Expenditure Under Agreement.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25926</link>
    <description>Nature of expenditure - the features of agreement clearly established that what was obtained by the assessee was only a licence and what was paid by the assessee to the foreign collaborator was only a licence fee and not the price for acquisition of any capital asset and, therefore, the Tribunal was right in treating the amount as revenue expenditure - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 15:21:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 15:21:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Rules Payment as License Fee, Not Capital Asset Acquisition; Classified as Revenue Expenditure Under Agreement.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25926</link>
      <description>Nature of expenditure - the features of agreement clearly established that what was obtained by the assessee was only a licence and what was paid by the assessee to the foreign collaborator was only a licence fee and not the price for acquisition of any capital asset and, therefore, the Tribunal was right in treating the amount as revenue expenditure - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 15:21:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>