<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 46 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1105</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, Ruchi Health Foods Ltd. and KTV Oil Mills, determining that their packing and labeling activities of imported palm oil/palmolein did not amount to manufacturing under the relevant Chapter Note of the CETA 1985. As a result, the duty demands imposed on the appellants were deemed unsustainable, leading to the Tribunal setting aside the orders and allowing all three appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 46 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1105</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, Ruchi Health Foods Ltd. and KTV Oil Mills, determining that their packing and labeling activities of imported palm oil/palmolein did not amount to manufacturing under the relevant Chapter Note of the CETA 1985. As a result, the duty demands imposed on the appellants were deemed unsustainable, leading to the Tribunal setting aside the orders and allowing all three appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>