<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1137 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175216</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in directing age relaxation for SC/ST and OBC candidates based on a non-binding precedent. The doctrine of legitimate expectation did not apply as there was no promise of regularization, and the discrimination claim was unfounded. The judgment was set aside, and the appeals were allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 22:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1137 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175216</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in directing age relaxation for SC/ST and OBC candidates based on a non-binding precedent. The doctrine of legitimate expectation did not apply as there was no promise of regularization, and the discrimination claim was unfounded. The judgment was set aside, and the appeals were allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>