<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 619 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267810</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal, along with the respondent&#039;s cross objection, was disposed of by a common order. The appellant&#039;s refund claim following a Tribunal decision was initially rejected but allowed by the first appellate authority. The Tribunal confirmed non-taxability under &#039;Business Auxiliary Services,&#039; and the tax liability was undisputed. The argument of document discrepancies was dismissed, and the impugned order was upheld as correct and legally sound. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, and the respondent&#039;s cross objection was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:19:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 619 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267810</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal, along with the respondent&#039;s cross objection, was disposed of by a common order. The appellant&#039;s refund claim following a Tribunal decision was initially rejected but allowed by the first appellate authority. The Tribunal confirmed non-taxability under &#039;Business Auxiliary Services,&#039; and the tax liability was undisputed. The argument of document discrepancies was dismissed, and the impugned order was upheld as correct and legally sound. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, and the respondent&#039;s cross objection was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>