<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 614 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267805</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant to raise the Section 73(3) plea before the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) for reconsideration of the penalty under Section 76, emphasizing procedural fairness. The impugned order was adjusted to address this new argument, ensuring a fair hearing opportunity for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:19:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 614 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267805</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant to raise the Section 73(3) plea before the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) for reconsideration of the penalty under Section 76, emphasizing procedural fairness. The impugned order was adjusted to address this new argument, ensuring a fair hearing opportunity for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>