<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 613 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267804</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning the demand of service tax under Technical Testing and Certification Service. The petitioner, a jewellery appraiser certifying the purity and value of gold ornaments for pledging, received commission from the bank. The Tribunal held that the service provided did not qualify as Technical Testing and Certification Service, as it involved certifying the purity and value of gold for pledging rather than technical testing. Consequently, the impugned order demanding service tax, interest, and penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2016 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 613 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267804</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning the demand of service tax under Technical Testing and Certification Service. The petitioner, a jewellery appraiser certifying the purity and value of gold ornaments for pledging, received commission from the bank. The Tribunal held that the service provided did not qualify as Technical Testing and Certification Service, as it involved certifying the purity and value of gold for pledging rather than technical testing. Consequently, the impugned order demanding service tax, interest, and penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>