<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 610 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267801</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld service tax liability on payments to service providers post 18-04-2006 but set aside penalties as the appellant had already discharged the liability. The issue of service tax liability on withholding tax for remittances made abroad was remanded for further consideration by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 610 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267801</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld service tax liability on payments to service providers post 18-04-2006 but set aside penalties as the appellant had already discharged the liability. The issue of service tax liability on withholding tax for remittances made abroad was remanded for further consideration by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>