<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 603 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267794</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the assessee&#039;s declared value of $4 per pipe for imported condensers over the Revenue&#039;s valuation of $45.6 per piece. It was determined that the goods originated from China, refuting the Revenue&#039;s assertion of Japanese origin. Insufficient evidence was provided to justify the higher valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 603 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267794</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the assessee&#039;s declared value of $4 per pipe for imported condensers over the Revenue&#039;s valuation of $45.6 per piece. It was determined that the goods originated from China, refuting the Revenue&#039;s assertion of Japanese origin. Insufficient evidence was provided to justify the higher valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>