<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 601 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267792</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Central Excise Settlement Commission&#039;s decision to impose a portion of the total penalty on a company and its directors while granting immunity from prosecution under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The petitioners&#039; argument that the penalty imposition without full quantification was unjust and illegal was dismissed. The Court emphasized that by admitting duty liability and accepting immunity, the petitioners were bound by the penalty imposed, as per statutory provisions. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commission&#039;s order and highlighting the binding nature of settlements under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 17:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 601 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267792</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Central Excise Settlement Commission&#039;s decision to impose a portion of the total penalty on a company and its directors while granting immunity from prosecution under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The petitioners&#039; argument that the penalty imposition without full quantification was unjust and illegal was dismissed. The Court emphasized that by admitting duty liability and accepting immunity, the petitioners were bound by the penalty imposed, as per statutory provisions. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commission&#039;s order and highlighting the binding nature of settlements under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>