https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267785 Where bagasse emerged as a waste product in sugar manufacture and was used as fuel in boilers, the requirement to reverse CENVAT credit or pay an amount under Rule 6 was not upheld. The dispute was treated as covered by the earlier Allahabad HC ruling quashing the Board circular that had required such reversal or payment in these circumstances, so the impugned orders were found unsustainable and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief. en-us Fri, 29 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Nov 2017 14:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267785 Where bagasse emerged as a waste product in sugar manufacture and was used as fuel in boilers, the requirement to reverse CENVAT credit or pay an amount under Rule 6 was not upheld. The dispute was treated as covered by the earlier Allahabad HC ruling quashing the Board circular that had required such reversal or payment in these circumstances, so the impugned orders were found unsustainable and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267785