<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 590 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267781</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, determining that depreciation on fixed assets should be allowed even if the cost was claimed as application of income in previous years. Additionally, advance fees received for the next academic session should not be treated as income for the current assessment year, and the CIT(A)&#039;s enhancement of the assessment without due process was deemed unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 590 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267781</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, determining that depreciation on fixed assets should be allowed even if the cost was claimed as application of income in previous years. Additionally, advance fees received for the next academic session should not be treated as income for the current assessment year, and the CIT(A)&#039;s enhancement of the assessment without due process was deemed unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>