<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 580 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267771</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal by directing the deletion of the addition related to the loss on the sale of machinery and allowing the royalty expenditure as revenue. The interest levy under Section 234B was considered consequential and not elaborated upon. The judgment provided detailed reasoning for each issue, ensuring a fair decision based on the facts and legal provisions presented during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:15:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 580 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267771</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal by directing the deletion of the addition related to the loss on the sale of machinery and allowing the royalty expenditure as revenue. The interest levy under Section 234B was considered consequential and not elaborated upon. The judgment provided detailed reasoning for each issue, ensuring a fair decision based on the facts and legal provisions presented during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>