<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 577 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267768</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 2.5 crores as income, as it was deemed an advance and had not crystallized during the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal also remitted other issues back to the AO for verification and appropriate action, partly allowing the appeals for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:15:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 577 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267768</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 2.5 crores as income, as it was deemed an advance and had not crystallized during the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal also remitted other issues back to the AO for verification and appropriate action, partly allowing the appeals for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>