<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 574 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267765</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the appellant&#039;s conduct was deemed bona fide and there was an honest difference of opinion with the Revenue regarding the set-off of losses. The Tribunal concluded that the penalty was not warranted in this case, given the debatable nature of the issue and the appellant&#039;s proactive disclosure of relevant facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:15:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 574 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267765</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the appellant&#039;s conduct was deemed bona fide and there was an honest difference of opinion with the Revenue regarding the set-off of losses. The Tribunal concluded that the penalty was not warranted in this case, given the debatable nature of the issue and the appellant&#039;s proactive disclosure of relevant facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>