<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 566 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175207</link>
    <description>The appellants provided Business Auxiliary Service without registration or paying service tax. Penalties were imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Commissioner set aside the penalty under Section 78, finding no intention to evade tax. The Tribunal waived penalties under Section 80 due to the appellants&#039; prior tax payments, registration history, and ignorance of legal provisions. The appeal was allowed, and penalties were waived.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 10:57:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 566 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175207</link>
      <description>The appellants provided Business Auxiliary Service without registration or paying service tax. Penalties were imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Commissioner set aside the penalty under Section 78, finding no intention to evade tax. The Tribunal waived penalties under Section 80 due to the appellants&#039; prior tax payments, registration history, and ignorance of legal provisions. The appeal was allowed, and penalties were waived.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>