<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1081 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175201</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to pre-deposit a specific duty amount under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act within eight weeks, with the possibility of waiver and stay of recovery for penalties and remaining duty upon compliance. The decision emphasized the significance of factual analysis, legal arguments, and procedural adherence in cases related to duty demands and penalties concerning clandestine manufacturing activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 10:05:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1081 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175201</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to pre-deposit a specific duty amount under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act within eight weeks, with the possibility of waiver and stay of recovery for penalties and remaining duty upon compliance. The decision emphasized the significance of factual analysis, legal arguments, and procedural adherence in cases related to duty demands and penalties concerning clandestine manufacturing activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>