<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 71 -  CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1093</link>
    <description>Where stock-transferred components are later sold by a sister unit in the wholesale spares market, an ascertainable market price may govern valuation under section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, and cost construction under section 4(1)(b) and Rule 6(b)(ii) of the 1975 Valuation Rules is not attracted. The text also notes that invocation of the extended period and related penalties must be examined independently, particularly where revenue neutrality is relevant, and that unconsidered claims regarding utilisation of Special Excise Duty credit against Basic Excise Duty require fresh adjudication. The discussion therefore reflects partial confirmation of duty valuation, with remand on limitation, penalties, and credit availability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 71 -  CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1093</link>
      <description>Where stock-transferred components are later sold by a sister unit in the wholesale spares market, an ascertainable market price may govern valuation under section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, and cost construction under section 4(1)(b) and Rule 6(b)(ii) of the 1975 Valuation Rules is not attracted. The text also notes that invocation of the extended period and related penalties must be examined independently, particularly where revenue neutrality is relevant, and that unconsidered claims regarding utilisation of Special Excise Duty credit against Basic Excise Duty require fresh adjudication. The discussion therefore reflects partial confirmation of duty valuation, with remand on limitation, penalties, and credit availability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>