<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 568 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267759</link>
    <description>The tribunal found in favor of the appellant regarding the taxability of services under works contracts pre- and post-01.06.2007, stating they were not taxable before the specified date. However, the demand for service tax on specific services rendered was upheld due to lack of documentary evidence. The appellant was granted the benefit of the composition scheme for works contract services, reducing the confirmed amount significantly. The tribunal deferred discussion on the time bar issue. Insufficient documentary evidence weakened the appellant&#039;s case, leading to a directive for a pre-deposit to comply with statutory requirements. Failure to do so would result in appeal dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:55:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 568 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267759</link>
      <description>The tribunal found in favor of the appellant regarding the taxability of services under works contracts pre- and post-01.06.2007, stating they were not taxable before the specified date. However, the demand for service tax on specific services rendered was upheld due to lack of documentary evidence. The appellant was granted the benefit of the composition scheme for works contract services, reducing the confirmed amount significantly. The tribunal deferred discussion on the time bar issue. Insufficient documentary evidence weakened the appellant&#039;s case, leading to a directive for a pre-deposit to comply with statutory requirements. Failure to do so would result in appeal dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>