<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 564 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267755</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a merit-based review, with the condition that the appellant make a pre-deposit of 10% of the disputed service tax liability. The appellant was required to confirm this deposit to the Commissioner within thirty days of the order. The stay application and appeal were disposed of based on these terms, allowing for a reevaluation of the case on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:55:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 564 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267755</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a merit-based review, with the condition that the appellant make a pre-deposit of 10% of the disputed service tax liability. The appellant was required to confirm this deposit to the Commissioner within thirty days of the order. The stay application and appeal were disposed of based on these terms, allowing for a reevaluation of the case on its merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>