<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 557 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267748</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by M/s Mohanlal Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. was dismissed as it was deemed not maintainable since they did not appeal the confirmed demands with interest and penalty. However, the appeal filed by Shri Arvind Mohanlal Jain was accepted as the penalty imposed on him was found to be incorrect due to the absence of a proper show cause notice. The penalty imposed on Shri Arvind Mohanlal Jain was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 557 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267748</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by M/s Mohanlal Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. was dismissed as it was deemed not maintainable since they did not appeal the confirmed demands with interest and penalty. However, the appeal filed by Shri Arvind Mohanlal Jain was accepted as the penalty imposed on him was found to be incorrect due to the absence of a proper show cause notice. The penalty imposed on Shri Arvind Mohanlal Jain was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>