<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 556 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267747</link>
    <description>Clearance of duty-free cotton yarn under Notification No. 43/2001-C.E. (N.T.) was held to satisfy the export condition where the manufactured terry towel fabrics were supplied to a 100% export-oriented undertaking and the final products were exported with proof of export produced. The operative requirement was export of the goods manufactured from the duty-free material, not that the assessee itself must physically export the final product. Following the consistent view on the same notification and identical issue, supply to the export-oriented undertaking was treated as sufficient compliance, and the demand was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 556 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267747</link>
      <description>Clearance of duty-free cotton yarn under Notification No. 43/2001-C.E. (N.T.) was held to satisfy the export condition where the manufactured terry towel fabrics were supplied to a 100% export-oriented undertaking and the final products were exported with proof of export produced. The operative requirement was export of the goods manufactured from the duty-free material, not that the assessee itself must physically export the final product. Following the consistent view on the same notification and identical issue, supply to the export-oriented undertaking was treated as sufficient compliance, and the demand was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>