https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267743 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the son of Late A. Raja Rao, holding that he, as the legal heir, was the rightful claimant of the seized gold ornaments. The Tribunal found the Revenue's arguments to be based on presumptions, while the appellant provided concrete evidence supporting the claim. The Order-in-Original rejecting the claim was set aside, and the Tribunal directed the release of the gold ornaments to the appellant. The decision was made on 9/10/2015, emphasizing that the confiscation of the gold was not part of the appealed order. en-us Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 May 2016 17:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267743 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the son of Late A. Raja Rao, holding that he, as the legal heir, was the rightful claimant of the seized gold ornaments. The Tribunal found the Revenue's arguments to be based on presumptions, while the appellant provided concrete evidence supporting the claim. The Order-in-Original rejecting the claim was set aside, and the Tribunal directed the release of the gold ornaments to the appellant. The decision was made on 9/10/2015, emphasizing that the confiscation of the gold was not part of the appealed order. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267743