<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 534 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267725</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal on all grounds. It emphasized the necessity of actual income receipt or accrual, highlighting the absence of provisions in the Act to assess notional income. Judgments were pronounced on 30th September 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:53:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 534 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267725</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal on all grounds. It emphasized the necessity of actual income receipt or accrual, highlighting the absence of provisions in the Act to assess notional income. Judgments were pronounced on 30th September 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>