<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 526 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267717</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by waiving the penalty under Section 78 for intellectual property services but upheld the service tax demand and interest payment already made by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 526 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267717</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by waiving the penalty under Section 78 for intellectual property services but upheld the service tax demand and interest payment already made by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>