<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 523 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267714</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing penalties and upholding penalties only for motor vehicle services. The penalty under Section 77 was reduced, and penalties under Section 78 were dropped for specific services where reasonable cause was established. The judgment balanced penalty imposition based on awareness of tax liabilities and ongoing legal uncertainties regarding certain services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2015 06:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 523 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267714</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing penalties and upholding penalties only for motor vehicle services. The penalty under Section 77 was reduced, and penalties under Section 78 were dropped for specific services where reasonable cause was established. The judgment balanced penalty imposition based on awareness of tax liabilities and ongoing legal uncertainties regarding certain services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>