https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267705 The Tribunal set aside the demand of duty for the extended period due to lack of suppression of facts known to authorities earlier. The inclusion of the cost of moulds and dyes in the assessable value was disputed, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the Appellant due to the absence of malafide intent. The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty for the normal period but directed a reevaluation based on previous directives. One appeal was allowed with consequential relief, while the other saw the demand for the extended period set aside. en-us Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:41:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267705 The Tribunal set aside the demand of duty for the extended period due to lack of suppression of facts known to authorities earlier. The inclusion of the cost of moulds and dyes in the assessable value was disputed, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the Appellant due to the absence of malafide intent. The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty for the normal period but directed a reevaluation based on previous directives. One appeal was allowed with consequential relief, while the other saw the demand for the extended period set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267705