<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 513 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267704</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, holding that the adjustment of duty without a demand notice was improper. As there was no notice of demand or show cause notice issued for the alleged duty shortfall, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment emphasizes the importance of following due process and issuing proper notices before making adjustments or demanding payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 513 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267704</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, holding that the adjustment of duty without a demand notice was improper. As there was no notice of demand or show cause notice issued for the alleged duty shortfall, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment emphasizes the importance of following due process and issuing proper notices before making adjustments or demanding payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>