https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267703 The appellant successfully challenged the order upholding the demand for an extended period but setting aside penalties. The court agreed that the issue of time bar was raised and noted a mistake in the records, emphasizing the need for rectification. Penalties were not imposed due to an interpretational error, with the court ruling in favor of the appellant based on the interpretation of legal provisions and case law. The Revenue's appeal was rejected as the court cannot review its own orders on merits. en-us Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:41:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267703 The appellant successfully challenged the order upholding the demand for an extended period but setting aside penalties. The court agreed that the issue of time bar was raised and noted a mistake in the records, emphasizing the need for rectification. Penalties were not imposed due to an interpretational error, with the court ruling in favor of the appellant based on the interpretation of legal provisions and case law. The Revenue's appeal was rejected as the court cannot review its own orders on merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267703