<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 43 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1083</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT directed the Commissioner of Central Excise to refund a specified amount with interest, but the Commissioner failed to implement the order. Despite subsequent directives from the Tribunal, the order remained unimplemented, leading to the Tribunal emphasizing the seriousness of the matter. The Tribunal deemed the non-implementation as a serious issue, directing immediate compliance and personal appearance before the Bench. The Tribunal allowed the Miscellaneous application and instructed action against the Commissioner for defiance, highlighting the justness of the implementation directive as the Revenue had not appealed the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 43 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1083</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT directed the Commissioner of Central Excise to refund a specified amount with interest, but the Commissioner failed to implement the order. Despite subsequent directives from the Tribunal, the order remained unimplemented, leading to the Tribunal emphasizing the seriousness of the matter. The Tribunal deemed the non-implementation as a serious issue, directing immediate compliance and personal appearance before the Bench. The Tribunal allowed the Miscellaneous application and instructed action against the Commissioner for defiance, highlighting the justness of the implementation directive as the Revenue had not appealed the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>