<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 497 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267688</link>
    <description>Section 340(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure operates independently of section 344, so a prior finding under section 344 is not a condition precedent to a preliminary inquiry if the court considers a complaint expedient in the interests of justice. The court also held that affidavits could disclose a prima facie case of false evidence and a dishonest false claim where the statements on financial incapacity and absence of assets were inconsistent with audit material and bank records. On that basis, it directed a complaint to be filed against the respondents for offences corresponding to false evidence and false claims in judicial proceedings, while leaving the merits to the competent Magistrate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:39:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 497 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267688</link>
      <description>Section 340(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure operates independently of section 344, so a prior finding under section 344 is not a condition precedent to a preliminary inquiry if the court considers a complaint expedient in the interests of justice. The court also held that affidavits could disclose a prima facie case of false evidence and a dishonest false claim where the statements on financial incapacity and absence of assets were inconsistent with audit material and bank records. On that basis, it directed a complaint to be filed against the respondents for offences corresponding to false evidence and false claims in judicial proceedings, while leaving the merits to the competent Magistrate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>