<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 480 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267671</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the addition of Rs. 5,18,000 under Section 41(1)(a) was not justified as the liability was from a previous year, and there was no remission or cessation during the relevant year. Consequently, the basis for the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was invalid. The Tribunal deleted the penalty of Rs. 1,51,930, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:38:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 480 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267671</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the addition of Rs. 5,18,000 under Section 41(1)(a) was not justified as the liability was from a previous year, and there was no remission or cessation during the relevant year. Consequently, the basis for the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was invalid. The Tribunal deleted the penalty of Rs. 1,51,930, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>