<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (1) TMI 51 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175193</link>
    <description>Fraud affecting only the contents of a gift deed renders the instrument voidable, not void, and limitation under Article 95 runs from discovery of the fraud; on that basis, the challenge to plots 91 and 92 was within time. By contrast, where a gift was found to have been procured by undue influence, the burden under Section 16(3) of the Contract Act and Section 111 of the Evidence Act applied, but limitation under Article 91 ran from knowledge of the facts entitling cancellation; on that basis, the challenge to plots 407/1 and 409/1 was time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (1) TMI 51 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175193</link>
      <description>Fraud affecting only the contents of a gift deed renders the instrument voidable, not void, and limitation under Article 95 runs from discovery of the fraud; on that basis, the challenge to plots 91 and 92 was within time. By contrast, where a gift was found to have been procured by undue influence, the burden under Section 16(3) of the Contract Act and Section 111 of the Evidence Act applied, but limitation under Article 91 ran from knowledge of the facts entitling cancellation; on that basis, the challenge to plots 407/1 and 409/1 was time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>