https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175193 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, granting the appellant a decree that the gift deed (Ex. 45) was not binding concerning plots 91 and 92 of Lingadahalli village. The appellant was entitled to recover possession of these plots with mesne profits. The decree of the High Court was set aside, and the decree of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Bijapur, was restored. The suit concerning plots 407/1 and 409/1 of Tadavalga village remained barred by limitation. The appeal was allowed with costs. en-us Wed, 17 Jan 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175193 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, granting the appellant a decree that the gift deed (Ex. 45) was not binding concerning plots 91 and 92 of Lingadahalli village. The appellant was entitled to recover possession of these plots with mesne profits. The decree of the High Court was set aside, and the decree of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Bijapur, was restored. The suit concerning plots 407/1 and 409/1 of Tadavalga village remained barred by limitation. The appeal was allowed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Jan 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175193