https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175192 An examination rule deeming possession of papers, books, notes, or other relevant material in the examination hall to be unfair means is satisfied by proof of possession alone. Actual use of the material is unnecessary, and the rule does not require a rebuttable presumption or any distinction between bona fide and mala fide possession. Once incriminating written material relevant to the paper is recovered from the candidate, the misconduct is established under the rule. The Supreme Court therefore held that the High Court was wrong to require proof of actual use, and the finding of unfair means could stand on possession alone. en-us Fri, 15 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:59:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175192 An examination rule deeming possession of papers, books, notes, or other relevant material in the examination hall to be unfair means is satisfied by proof of possession alone. Actual use of the material is unnecessary, and the rule does not require a rebuttable presumption or any distinction between bona fide and mala fide possession. Once incriminating written material relevant to the paper is recovered from the candidate, the misconduct is established under the rule. The Supreme Court therefore held that the High Court was wrong to require proof of actual use, and the finding of unfair means could stand on possession alone. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175192