https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175192 The Supreme Court held that possession of written material during an examination constitutes the use of unfair means, regardless of whether the material was actually used. The Court rejected the distinction between bona fide or mala fide possession, emphasizing that possession alone is sufficient to prove the charge of using unfair means. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's judgment, and dismissed the writ petition, upholding the decision that possession of written material during an examination constitutes a violation of examination rules under Rule 36.1(iv)(a). en-us Fri, 15 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:59:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175192 The Supreme Court held that possession of written material during an examination constitutes the use of unfair means, regardless of whether the material was actually used. The Court rejected the distinction between bona fide or mala fide possession, emphasizing that possession alone is sufficient to prove the charge of using unfair means. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's judgment, and dismissed the writ petition, upholding the decision that possession of written material during an examination constitutes a violation of examination rules under Rule 36.1(iv)(a). Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175192