<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 478 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267669</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed on the appellant under Section 78, affirming the tax liability, interest, and penalties. The appellant&#039;s arguments against penalties were rejected, emphasizing compliance with tax laws and dismissing claims of non-taxability for various services. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s actions indicated suppression and misstatement of tax liability, leading to the decision to uphold the penalties imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 478 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267669</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed on the appellant under Section 78, affirming the tax liability, interest, and penalties. The appellant&#039;s arguments against penalties were rejected, emphasizing compliance with tax laws and dismissing claims of non-taxability for various services. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s actions indicated suppression and misstatement of tax liability, leading to the decision to uphold the penalties imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>